Net Frontier Marketing


What John Could have done Differently

Posted in Black Hat SEO by alex on the May 31st, 2007

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

So I wrote a review of John Chow’s blog a couple of days ago stating amongst other things that he had gotten the #1 rank on Google for Make Money Online, a very desirable term.

A mere 2 days later, Google is doing one of its dances and he has been thrust far away from the party and onto the 5th page of results.

In this post, he speculates that Google is cracking down on the link back review format (review my blog and I’ll link to it).

I’m pretty sure it has nothing to do with what John experienced in his rankings. The real problem is that the linking scheme looked unnatural and that’s what Google caught.

Let’s look at the facts:

There are approximately 80 batches of 10 reviews up on Johnchow.com. That means 800 blogs have linked to his home page, all of which used the anchor text “make money online”.

Considering John’s blog is so popular, he has tens of thousands of incoming links with all sorts of different anchor text, which normally would give him sufficient authority in the eyes of our search master to perform this Google Bomb in near total impunity.

If he had less “natural” links or his blog was less of an authority, he would have been penalized for all the perfect anchor text links long ago. So maybe, just maybe, he reached the threshold were Google says enough is enough with the bombing already.

But it’s probably more than that. The big trouble is that all the blogs that link to his home page with the desired term also link to his “review my blog” page.

That irrevocably screws the pooch and places John’s link strategy just below Pamela Anderson’s chest on the scale of “natural”.

Furthermore, John obligingly links back to the blogs that reviewed him in groups of ten. This only serves to make everything all the more obvious to the point where Googlebot would catch it even when high on crack.

Here’s how it could have gone differently:

• Vary the anchor text ever so slightly, keeping your core terms but adding modifiers.
• Find another way to announce your “review this blog” offer. This was surely a real killer.
• Slow things down a bit. 800 in the space of 2 months is a bit of an overkill.
• Find a way to publish the link backs to the blogs that reviewed you other than repeating the same rule of 10 over and over. Maybe by adding 3 links in a box at the end of each post, or perhaps rotating them in the sidebar, adding them to past posts… Anything but the way it was done.

As John says, it’s no great loss to him. The loss of the term barely makes s a 1% dent in his daily traffic.

I’m just surprised it went on for so long. This only proves that authority sites have extreme leeway when it comes to “creative” link hoarding but they are not entirely immune.

Google doesn’t want you manipulating the search results. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do it, you should just be sneakier about it, that’s all.

Other related posts

5 Responses to 'What John Could have done Differently'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'What John Could have done Differently'.

  1. Jim Kukral said,

    on June 1st, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    “Google doesn’t want you manipulating the search results. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do it, you should just be sneakier about it, that’s all.”

    Very, very bad advice.

  2. Andy Beard said,

    on June 1st, 2007 at 10:51 pm

    It seems to me to be a -30 slap on more competitive keywords, not just that term.
    It is quite possible that it could also be related to his unrelated text link ads.

    1% of traffic could equal 10% of potential new subscribers.

    If it is really 150 visitors per day and he converted them well, it could be 150 new subscribers or more per month.

    That is actually something worthwhile.

    If it has hit other terms, it could cost more search traffic.

  3. alex said,

    on June 2nd, 2007 at 2:39 am

    Hey Guys,

    Jim: I’m going to have to strongly disagree with you and be disapointed you didn’t care to elaborate your opinion.

    Andy: I thought about the minus 30 penaly but right now I see John in position 43 which means there is something else at play.

    The text link theory is a good one and it will be interesting once it becomes possible to draw intelligent inferences based on data.

    I agree with you on the loss. It’s bigger than it seems and while I don’t think he was getting anywhere near the potential money out of such a good keyword, it’s still a big hit.

    I spoke to John briefly and he says he has it figured out, we’ll have to see…

  4. Andy Beard said,

    on June 3rd, 2007 at 11:02 am

    I do know he has gained a huge amount of free links for the controversy on this and a few other things over the last 2 weeks.though a lot of his older content doesn’t seem to rank very well.

    He does seem to have regained top spot though for the key phrase and it takes a lot to displace Bidvertiser with their noscript links.

  5. alex said,

    on June 4th, 2007 at 10:20 am

    Hey Andy,

    Links breed links…

    Seems like we got all fired up for nothing and Google still doesn’t have the key. Maybe John will care to enlighten us…

Leave a Reply